![]() |
|
Welcome to the CSS & Stylesheet Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| Tags: job, opportunities, usability |
![]() |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote: > [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: > > ... > Recruiting Manager > Human Factors International This bit of spam I don't get. 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't fathom them doing it It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? -- Berg |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:00:30 -0600, Bergamot put finger to keyboard
and typed: >RafaMinu wrote: >> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >> >> ... >> Recruiting Manager >> Human Factors International > >This bit of spam I don't get. >1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >fathom them doing it > >It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? It could be a joe-job. Or it could be an enthusiastic but ignorant junior member of HFI staff. Mark -- http://www.BritishSurnames.co.uk - What does your surname say about you? "We're not the ones who're meant to follow" |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote:
>> It could be a joe-job. Or it could be an enthusiastic but ignorant >> junior member of HFI staff. > > None of the above. > > I sincerely fail to see what's wrong with the post. > > Please, explain what it is that bothers you so much. > > Because it's SPAM, that's why. And why would you post it unless you're either a junior member of the HFI staff, or doing a joe-job? I hope they can you. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ================== |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote:
> On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >> RafaMinu wrote: >>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >>> ... >>> Recruiting Manager >>> Human Factors International >> This bit of spam I don't get. >> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >> fathom them doing it >> >> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? > > And who says I'm a HFI representative? > I find the information interesting and I post it here because it might > be of interest to other people. > What's the problem? > Yea... right. Someone who never posted in these newsgroups before all of a sudden starts posting SPAM? You must be a joe-jobber. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle JDS Computer Training Corp. jstucklex@attglobal.net ================== |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote:
> On Dec 31, 8:16 pm, Mark Goodge <use...@listmail.good-stuff.co.uk> > wrote: >> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:00:30 -0600, Bergamot put finger to keyboard >> and typed: >> >>> RafaMinu wrote: >>>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >>>> ... >>>> Recruiting Manager >>>> Human Factors International >>> This bit of spam I don't get. >>> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >>> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >>> fathom them doing it >>> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >>> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? >> It could be a joe-job. Or it could be an enthusiastic but ignorant >> junior member of HFI staff. > > None of the above. > > I sincerely fail to see what's wrong with the post. > > Please, explain what it is that bothers you so much. The explanation above looked pretty clear to me. Are you asking him to repeat it? |
|
|||
|
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 21:57:48 +0100, Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > RafaMinu wrote: >> On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >>> RafaMinu wrote: >>>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >>>> ... >>>> Recruiting Manager >>>> Human Factors International >>> This bit of spam I don't get. >>> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >>> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >>> fathom them doing it >>> >>> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >>> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? >> And who says I'm a HFI representative? >> I find the information interesting and I post it here because it might >> be of interest to other people. >> What's the problem? >> > > Yea... right. > > Someone who never posted in these newsgroups before all of a sudden > starts posting SPAM? I have a feeling he has posted before. It's not for nothing he got caught in my spam filters... -- Rik Wasmus |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote:
> On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >> RafaMinu wrote: >>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >>> ... >>> Recruiting Manager >>> Human Factors International >> This bit of spam I don't get. >> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >> fathom them doing it >> >> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? > > And who says I'm a HFI representative? > I find the information interesting and I post it here because it might > be of interest to other people. > What's the problem? It's unusual for people to read an ad for some arbitrary service with which they have no affiliation and to be seized by the urge to place a note about it in multiple Usenet newsgroups in which they don't participate purely for the benefit of people they don't know. It isn't unreasonable in these cases to suspect that the note is a more-or-less disguised ad posted by a person who stands to benefit, directly or indirectly, from the posting. One time I saw a real idiot pull a stunt where he made himself out to be an ordinary consumer just like us who had discovered this fantastic product that he felt he had to share with us. He got really quiet after someone pointed out to him that the message's headers revealed that it had come from the very company that he was pretending only to have happened upon. |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu wrote:
> On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >> RafaMinu wrote: >> > [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >> >> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? > > And who says I'm a HFI representative? No one. You never identified yourself in any way, which made it suspicious from the get-go. If you were a regular in these newsgroups, it would still be spam but the ensuing discussion probably would have taken a different turn. > What's the problem? Clue deficiency? -- Berg |
|
|||
|
RafaMinu <rafaminu@hotmail.com> wrote in message:
f14fe715-0a80-4630-8240-fe745415881f...oglegroups.com, > On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >> RafaMinu wrote: >>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >> >>> ... >>> Recruiting Manager >>> Human Factors International >> >> This bit of spam I don't get. >> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >> fathom them doing it >> >> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely >> associated with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? > > And who says I'm a HFI representative? > I find the information interesting and I post it here because it might > be of interest to other people. > What's the problem? Besides the fact that your message is essentially unsolicted advertising and as such is unwelcome here, it appears as if you signed someone else's name to it. "Jim Garrett Recruiting Manager Human Factors International" Jim Garrett is located in Iowa Your IP indicates that you are located in Spain. And as was pointed out by someone else: "It's unusual for people to read an ad for some arbitrary service with which they have no affiliation and to be seized by the urge to place a note about it in multiple Usenet newsgroups in which they don't participate purely for the benefit of people they don't know." It's not just unusual, but rather unheard of. This sort of thing (to this extent) is never done by a disinterested third party. There's always a hidden agenda. -- Red |
|
|||
|
"Harlan Messinger" wrote in message news:5tt4c3F1fblqqU1@mid.individual.net... > RafaMinu wrote: >> On Dec 31, 8:00 pm, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote: >>> RafaMinu wrote: >>>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions: >>>> ... >>>> Recruiting Manager >>>> Human Factors International >>> This bit of spam I don't get. >>> 1. A bona fide HFI representative wouldn't be using a hotmail address >>> 2. HFI should have no need to spam Usenet with this stuff and I can't >>> fathom them doing it >>> >>> It's inconceivable to me that this spammer is even remotely associated >>> with HFI. What benefit could he possibly get out of this? >> >> And who says I'm a HFI representative? >> I find the information interesting and I post it here because it might >> be of interest to other people. >> What's the problem? > > It's unusual for people to read an ad for some arbitrary service with > which they have no affiliation and to be seized by the urge to place a > note about it in multiple Usenet newsgroups in which they don't > participate purely for the benefit of people they don't know. It isn't > unreasonable in these cases to suspect that the note is a more-or-less > disguised ad posted by a person who stands to benefit, directly or > indirectly, from the posting. And then when I pulled a sarcy reply, I get a wonderful and highly informative one back. Hmm... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
- Contact Us
-|-
CSS & Stylesheet Forums -|-
Archive -|-
Top -|-Rules/Disclaimer-|-Help/Support-|-Advertise