RafaMinu wrote:
>> >>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions:
>> >>> ...
>> >>> Recruiting Manager
>> >>> Human Factors International
>
> Believe or not the only interest behind the posting is nothing else
> than provide useful information.

What makes HFI's job openings different or more useful than the other
zillion job postings out there? You aren't going to spam Usenet with all
of them, are you?

--
Berg

RafaMinu wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2:48 am, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote:
>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>>>>>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions:
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Recruiting Manager
>>>>>>> Human Factors International
>>> Believe or not the only interest behind the posting is nothing else
>>> than provide useful information.
>> What makes HFI's job openings different or more useful than the other
>> zillion job postings out there? You aren't going to spam Usenet with all
>> of them, are you?
>
> The very nature of the job offered is what makes it different.
> It's all about accessibility and usability. A most interesting topic
> and related to ALL Groups posted.
> I just wish this thread would focus on that topic.
> If you want to discuss about SPAM, then you should focus your
> attention to the hundreds of SPAM messages posted on this Group on a
> regular basis.
>

No, it doesn't. There are zillions of other job postings of similar types.

You're just a spammer. Nothing more, nothing less.

And we're not talking about other spammers. We're talking about YOU.

We are focusing on the topic - YOUR SPAM.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

RafaMinu wrote:
> On Jan 3, 1:51 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>> On Jan 3, 2:48 am, Bergamot <berga...@visi.com> wrote:
>>>> RafaMinu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> [spam about] Consulting and teaching positions:
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> Recruiting Manager
>>>>>>>>> Human Factors International
>>>>> Believe or not the only interest behind the posting is nothing else
>>>>> than provide useful information.
>>>> What makes HFI's job openings different or more useful than the other
>>>> zillion job postings out there? You aren't going to spam Usenet with all
>>>> of them, are you?
>>> The very nature of the job offered is what makes it different.
>>> It's all about accessibility and usability. A most interesting topic
>>> and related to ALL Groups posted.
>>> I just wish this thread would focus on that topic.
>>> If you want to discuss about SPAM, then you should focus your
>>> attention to the hundreds of SPAM messages posted on this Group on a
>>> regular basis.
>> No, it doesn't. There are zillions of other job postings of similar types.
> Untrue.
> Show me just one.
>

Just google. You'll find them all over the place.

>> You're just a spammer. Nothing more, nothing less.
>>
>> And we're not talking about other spammers. We're talking about YOU.
>>
>> We are focusing on the topic - YOUR SPAM.
> Wrong.
> The topic I started is about accesibilty job openings.
> Alternatively I offered some advice to a novel musician.
> Your replies are the ones that are utterly off-topic and not welcomed.
> If you are interested in SPAM, I suggest you stay away from this
> thread and get into one of the zillion SPAM messages available
> somewhere else.
>

The topic you started is SPAM. Nothing more, nothing less. And we're
discussing your SPAM.

Get lost, SPAMMER. Your kind are not welcome here.

And I and others will keep telling you that until you get it through
your thick skull.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

>"RafaMinu" <rafa----@hotmail.com> wrote
[snip]
>Since you are unable to contribute anything positive to the thread,
>I'm going to add a few more links:
>
>Job Opening for Web Accessibility QA
>If you or someone you know has good experience and knowledge in Web
>Accessibility, and wants a good job in California (Silicon Valley),
>please contact me, Dennis, at webaxe at gmail dot com. The position is
>in the QA department for a company that does a financial web
>application.
>http://webaxe.___________-qa.html
>
>Open Posts
>MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
>Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>Web Accessibility Engineer
>
>European Research Consortium on Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM)
>Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>Web Accessibility and Ageing Consultant
>
>http://www.w3.org/_________ecruitment/
>
>Now, if you want to discuss these postings and/or contribute with
>other links, please do so.
>Otherwise stay off this thread and take your off-topic deviations
>somewhere else.

Now you've just gone and got your fingers up in the air in rebellion like a
kid. "F*ck you I won't do what you tell me"

---dE|_---

RafaMinu wrote:
> On Jan 3, 5:38 pm, "dE|_" <dee-e-...@crackguitar.com> wrote:
>>> "RafaMinu" <rafa-...@hotmail.com> wrote
>> [snip]
>>> Since you are unable to contribute anything positive to the thread,
>>> I'm going to add a few more links:
>>> Job Opening for Web Accessibility QA
>>> If you or someone you know has good experience and knowledge in Web
>>> Accessibility, and wants a good job in California (Silicon Valley),
>>> please contact me, Dennis, at webaxe at gmail dot com. The position is
>>> in the QA department for a company that does a financial web
>>> application.
>>> http://webaxe.___________-qa.html
>>> Open Posts
>>> MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>> Web Accessibility Engineer
>>> European Research Consortium on Informatics and Mathematics (ERCIM)
>>> Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>> Web Accessibility and Ageing Consultant
>>> http://www.w3.org/_________ecruitment/
>>> Now, if you want to discuss these postings and/or contribute with
>>> other links, please do so.
>>> Otherwise stay off this thread and take your off-topic deviations
>>> somewhere else.
>> Now you've just gone and got your fingers up in the air in rebellion like a
>> kid. "F*ck you I won't do what you tell me"
>
> Up yours ¡¡¡
>

You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it
with SPAM. Plain and simple. And now you SPAM more.

You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.

And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with
you - unless it's another spammer.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On 3/1/08 5:32 pm, in article woSdnZsPvMPzgeDanZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com,
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:

> You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it
> with SPAM. Plain and simple. And now you SPAM more.
>
> You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.
>
> And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with
> you - unless it's another spammer.

I don't get it. Why was the original post spam? Are you saying that there
are no jobs available and that the 'quoted' text is the prime reason for the
post?

Let's say I post the following:

Freelance designers wanted with experience of

* CSS
* xhtml
* Photoshop
* php/MySQL

Redcat Media are a leading edge web design and development agency based in
Hampshire in nice offices with free parking and we're also very good at
search engine optimisation.

Is that spam? By putting such a blatant plug for my company as an example,
is that double spam?

--
Andy Jacobs
http://www.redcatmedia.co.uk

RafaMinu wrote:
>
> Please stay focused on the main topic of the thread I started,

This is Usenet. We are free to discuss your post in any way we see fit.

> that is, Usability Job Opportunities.

The way we see it, the main topic of the thread you started is not
Usability Job Opportunities at all. If it were, you would have made some
additional comments about the field in general, or the ad in particular.
Regardless of your intentions, you came off as the HFI guy spamming Usenet.

> Otherwise I ask you politely to go away and pester someone else.

Perhaps you should quit while you're behind.

--
Berg

Andy Jacobs wrote:
> On 3/1/08 5:32 pm, in article woSdnZsPvMPzgeDanZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com,
> "Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> You did not start this discussion with usability issues. You started it
>> with SPAM. Plain and simple. And now you SPAM more.
>>
>> You aren't going to find anyone to discuss SPAM with you.
>>
>> And with that attitude, you won't find anyone to discuss ANYTHING with
>> you - unless it's another spammer.
>
> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam? Are you saying that there
> are no jobs available and that the 'quoted' text is the prime reason for the
> post?
>
> Let's say I post the following:
>
> Freelance designers wanted with experience of
>
> * CSS
> * xhtml
> * Photoshop
> * php/MySQL
>
> Redcat Media are a leading edge web design and development agency based in
> Hampshire in nice offices with free parking and we're also very good at
> search engine optimisation.
>
> Is that spam? By putting such a blatant plug for my company as an example,
> is that double spam?
>

Because ads are not wanted on a.w.w. It's in the FAQ's. That's what
a.w.w.a is for.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:57:04 +0100, ---- Gaughan <usenet@gaelweb.co.uk>
wrote:

> In <C3A2D429.F13D%nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> on Thu, 03 Jan 2008
> 18:04:25 +0000, Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I don't get it. Why was the original post spam?
>
> It wasn't. It was many things, including being a
> pathetically-badly disguised festering heap of marketing shite,
> but it wasn't spam.
>
> Those insisting it was spam are merely flaunting their
> cluelessness. A post is *only* defined as being spam when it
> breaches the Breidbart Index. Nobody has provided any evidence
> that that particular bit of midge's effluence has exceeded the BI.

The Breidbart Index is:
a) Only a measure of severity IMO, not wether or not something is spam.
b) Not the sole definitive definition of spam on usenet.
--
Rik Wasmus

On 3/1/08 6:40 pm, in article Xns9A1A80F09970Bcastleamber@130.133.1.4, "John
Bokma" <john@castleamber.com> wrote:

> Andy Jacobs <nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Let's say I post the following:
>
> Let's say that next time you do so on purpose I (and probably several
> others) /will/ report it as spam. You're quite the hypocrite with your
> nospam@redcatgroup.co.uk.
>
> In short: foad, thank you.

Sorry, did I miss the news about you being made god of usenet?

I was asking a genuine question about a thread which seems to have got out
of hand. I post regularly and even my signature is concise and to the
point.

Now if you can't answer that question properly or conduct yourself with some
humility and civility you might want to foad yourself.

--
Andy Jacobs
http://www.redcatmedia.co.uk