![]() |
|
Welcome to the CSS & Stylesheet Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| Tags: |
![]() |
|
|||
|
I've searched Google and the group archives, and came up empty, but maybe I just haven't selected the right search term. This concerns only the screen -- printing isn't an issue. I'm also not concerned about the appearance of the page in IE6 as long as the page is still usable. I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. I've got the menu in place using position:fixed. And using a padding-top, I have the text starting below the menu. But as soon as I scroll the text it slides under the menu, and when I click a link in the menu the anchor text is a the top of the viewport, under the window. Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do it in CSS2? -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ validator: http://validator.w3.org/ CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/ validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ Why We Won't Help You: http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
On 2008-09-30, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I've searched Google and the group archives, and came up empty, but > maybe I just haven't selected the right search term. > > This concerns only the screen -- printing isn't an issue. I'm also > not concerned about the appearance of the page in IE6 as long as the > page is still usable. > > I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top > "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the > viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all > point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. > > I've got the menu in place using position:fixed. And using a > padding-top, I have the text starting below the menu. But as soon as > I scroll the text it slides under the menu, and when I click a link > in the menu the anchor text is a the top of the viewport, under the > window. > > Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do > it in CSS2? You don't need to do position: fixed. Divide the page up with absolutely positioned divs and make each of them overflow: scroll. This kind of thing: .frame { position: absolute; left: 0; right: 0; overflow: scroll; -- .top { top: 0; height: 4em; -- .main { top: 4em; bottom: 0; -- .... <div class="frame top"> </div> <div class="frame main"> </div> |
|
|||
|
In article <slrnge52g5.4gn.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > > I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top > > "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the > > viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all > > point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. > > .... > > > > Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do > > it in CSS2? > > You don't need to do position: fixed. Divide the page up with absolutely > positioned divs and make each of them overflow: scroll. > > This kind of thing: > > .frame > { > position: absolute; > left: 0; > right: 0; > overflow: scroll; > -- Nice idea Ben... <http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/pseudoFrames.html> -- dorayme |
|
|||
|
On 2008-09-30, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <slrnge52g5.4gn.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > > >> > I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top >> > "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the >> > viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all >> > point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. >> > > ... >> > >> > Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do >> > it in CSS2? >> >> You don't need to do position: fixed. Divide the page up with absolutely >> positioned divs and make each of them overflow: scroll. >> >> This kind of thing: >> >> .frame >> { >> position: absolute; >> left: 0; >> right: 0; >> overflow: scroll; >> -- > > Nice idea Ben... > ><http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/pseudoFrames.html> What does height* mean? I had a look at view source and saw it there. Maybe it's a typo and that's why you also set background: #fcc on body. Using that #fifth link is a nice idea-- you couldn't do that with frames. |
|
|||
|
In article <slrnge69k1.3s4.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>,
Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > On 2008-09-30, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > In article <slrnge52g5.4gn.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, > > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > > > > > >> > I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top > >> > "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the > >> > viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all > >> > point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. > >> > > > ... > >> > > >> > Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do > >> > it in CSS2? > >> > >> You don't need to do position: fixed. Divide the page up with absolutely > >> positioned divs and make each of them overflow: scroll. > >> > >> This kind of thing: > >> > >> .frame > >> { > >> position: absolute; > >> left: 0; > >> right: 0; > >> overflow: scroll; > >> -- > > > > Nice idea Ben... > > > ><http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/pseudoFrames.html> > > What does height* mean? I had a look at view source and saw it there. Just my quick and dirty way to remove it for a moment. I forgot to remove it. I could bot see it being necessary > > Maybe it's a typo and that's why you also set background: #fcc on body. > > Using that #fifth link is a nice idea-- you couldn't do that with > frames. I don't think this is quite so, you can do it in frames. You just link to whatever#id in the target doc. Oh yes! I just remembered, you are of the modern generation which thinks iFrames whereas I think the T model job, real frames! <g> By the way, the first thought that struck me in looking at OP's problem was that he could have made fixed work (at least on FF and Safari) by attending to backgrounds: <http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/positionFixed.html> But yours was more interesting. -- dorayme |
|
|||
|
On 2008-10-01, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <slrnge69k1.3s4.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: > >> On 2008-09-30, dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >> > In article <slrnge52g5.4gn.spamspam@bowser.marioworld>, >> > Ben C <spamspam@spam.eggs> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> > I want to have two pseudo-frames, using only CSS and no JS. The top >> >> > "frame", 4em high, is a menu, and I want it to stay at the top of the >> >> > viewport. The rest of the page is the text. The menu items all >> >> > point to various anchors, <h2 id-...> and similar, in the page. >> >> > >> > ... >> >> > >> >> > Is there a way to set up these pseudo-frames, or can I truly not do >> >> > it in CSS2? >> >> >> >> You don't need to do position: fixed. Divide the page up with absolutely >> >> positioned divs and make each of them overflow: scroll. >> >> >> >> This kind of thing: >> >> >> >> .frame >> >> { >> >> position: absolute; >> >> left: 0; >> >> right: 0; >> >> overflow: scroll; >> >> -- >> > >> > Nice idea Ben... >> > >> ><http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/pseudoFrames.html> >> >> What does height* mean? I had a look at view source and saw it there. > > Just my quick and dirty way to remove it for a moment. I forgot to > remove it. I could bot see it being necessary > >> >> Maybe it's a typo and that's why you also set background: #fcc on body. >> >> Using that #fifth link is a nice idea-- you couldn't do that with >> frames. > > I don't think this is quite so, you can do it in frames. You just link > to whatever#id in the target doc. Oh yes! I just remembered, you are of > the modern generation which thinks iFrames whereas I think the T model > job, real frames! <g> No I was thinking of real frames this time. I'm sure you're right and it does work. > By the way, the first thought that struck me in looking at OP's problem > was that he could have made fixed work (at least on FF and Safari) by > attending to backgrounds: > ><http://dorayme.890m.com/alt/positionFixed.html> Yes that works too, and means you get to scroll the main "frame" with the proper viewport scrollbar. But quite jerky in Firefox because their implementation of position: fixed is crap. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
- Contact Us
-|-
CSS & Stylesheet Forums -|-
Archive -|-
Top -|-Rules/Disclaimer-|-Help/Support-|-Advertise